Robert Garza
January 24, 2026
4 min read

Every day, behind closed doors, family court judges make decisions that alter the lives of children and parents forever. Custody determinations, child support orders, restraining orders—these rulings shape families for generations. Yet unlike criminal courts, where public scrutiny is the norm, family courts operate largely in secret.
This lack of transparency creates fertile ground for abuse. Judges who never face public accountability can make arbitrary decisions. Parents without resources are steamrolled by the system. Constitutional rights are violated with no record to appeal.
It's time to bring family courts into the light.
Proponents of closed family courts argue that secrecy protects children's privacy. But the reality is that secrecy primarily protects judicial misconduct.
Children's identities can be protected through pseudonyms and redaction without hiding the entire proceeding. Criminal courts handle sensitive cases involving minors all the time while maintaining transparency. The difference is that family courts have historically resisted accountability.
Without public oversight, family courts have become breeding grounds for:
Recording family court proceedings would transform the system in several important ways:
When judges know their words and actions are being recorded, they behave differently. The mere presence of cameras encourages adherence to proper procedure and discourages arbitrary decision-making.
Currently, appellate courts rely on court transcripts that may be incomplete or inaccurate. Video recordings provide an objective record of what actually occurred, enabling meaningful appellate review.
False allegations of abuse are a common weapon in custody disputes. When accusers know their testimony is being recorded, they're less likely to fabricate or exaggerate claims.
Recorded proceedings can be used (with appropriate redactions) to educate the public about how family courts actually operate. This transparency builds understanding and drives reform.
Progress is happening across the country:
Response: Children's identities can be protected while still recording proceedings. The harm of hidden judicial abuse far outweighs privacy concerns that can be addressed through redaction.
Response: If parents present their best behavior when being recorded, that's a feature, not a bug. Reduced conflict in the courtroom benefits everyone, especially children.
Response: Modern technology makes recording seamless and inexpensive. The slight administrative burden is vastly outweighed by the benefits of accountability.
Robert Garza and Team has drafted comprehensive legislation requiring video recording of all family court proceedings. Key provisions include:
The fight for family court transparency is winnable, but we need your voice:
Transparency is the first step toward justice. When family courts operate in the light, judges are accountable, parents are protected, and children's best interests actually guide decisions.
Learn more about the legislation mentioned in this article.
View All Reform BillsDirector, Americans for Judicial Accountability
Robert Garza is a nationally recognized advocate for parental rights and family court reform. After surviving a 15-year custody battle with over 43 false CPS allegations, he became the architect of Texas SB 718 and has created 400+ reform bills now being used by advocates across all 50 states.